AND NOW WE CONDONE THE ASSASSINATION OF US CITIZENS...

[TheyCallMeX]

TweetOuch!!! Geeze guys. I had no idea my views were going to piss everyone off to such a drastic extreme. I wasn't referring to bin Laden!

To answer your questions--Synthro I have brothers that have DIED for this bs war. The ones that were fortunate and lucky enough are more fucked in the head than I thought imaginable. They're fortunate enough to make it home have even said that we need to bring our boys back. They're tired of being lied to. Obama is the one that set an assassination for a guy from the US because of his alleged ties to a terrorist group.

Is the guy a bad person with known terrorist ties? YES.

Do I think it's reasonable we take him out? YES.

But my point is what's to stop them from taking out any of us next that they deem 'a threat' ? All it would take is another McVeigh OKC bombing and then all US Citizens could be deemed a terrorist threat!

That's all I'm saying!

I was all for taking that POS bin laden out, but there should have been a form of closure for famlies rather than the tried and true word of our wonderful trustworthy government. They should have had DNA tests, pictures, SOMETHING of the sort.

[apollo]

TweetI too if forced to claim a party would claim libertarian. It is not the same as liberals which appear to me to believe freedom is being free of self-responsibility whereas libertarians believe in freedom through self-responsibility. Republicans apppear to want responsibility of everyone when it behooves them but I really don't give a fuck bc I can't or it'll break my heart. I am an irlaw. One who lives irregardless of law(as much as possible). That's different than an outlaw who is rebelious and lives mostly outside of tghe law.
Being that I don't acceptg authority and therefore professors are not giving me their truth as ultimate all- truth and media - I don't consume much of it- so I'm not sold nor fed beliefs. So I see mex's point but beliefs manifested physically are called feelings and Mex you hit a nerve. I don't think he was saying let the terrosist be free or run wild. I think he was saying what we lost as a whole was not worth the life of 1 man. And that's sad. Furthermore he is not saying that he is'nt glad Bin Laden is caught or dead nor that we should'nt have hung his head from the flagpole on the whitehouse lawn. I think what he's saying about the controlment aka government being a huge threat to freedom as is terrorism is valid. Beliefs whether ultimate truth or not are the filters through which we see the world and some of you could'nt see clearly what he was trying to say bc your filters caused feelings. To me the most influential influencing the. Or perhaps almost controlling the magority which rules in a democracy is not freeom for anyone cept the magority and perhaps ultimately only for those influential. Whereas in a republic each individual has rights that are'nt outweighed by the magority. Don't think $ influences elections? Why are there. Campaign spending laws and limits that admit such?
Why am I saying all this? I have no idea bc I'll never let some pussy politician that would cower from me in god's natural world ruule me nor will I even listen to or accept their authority over the creator. So anything I say is void in thie man ruled world. How in the ffuck could I ever let the nerds in school rule me? Lol or even the people who did what it took to be popular(aka manipulative). I walked down the hall and got ass the nerds have to make me look like the bad guy, put a guilt trip on the woman then feed her ego and play her savior and be her asskisser to get her to give him any but that just gives her a disatisfied life of righteousness which no one is(righteous). It's belief that causes war. We point the finger at bin laden his point the finger at us - it's all just an attempt to be right and fucking probably fucking pathetic to nature and the creative force. Fuck bin laden, fuck the govt and fuck you too if you don't like it! And am I right? I make no claim to be- I only call how it appears to me. Will I fight you over it? I'll only fight in defense of the safety of my right to self rule and my inalienablle rights and my physical safety.

[apollo]

TweetGunny said what he thought all politicians should have to have done and it got me thinking:
Instead of the silver spoon born politicians or power seeking ones or whatever they are:
I think all politicians should have to come from nothing to something- how can a politician lead people out of their poorness and all the problems or dysfunction or both if they have no understanding of where some are starting? I say(just my opinion) that politicians should be required to make that journey themselves and have come from some kind of dysfunction into functioning themselves- we'd certainly have less politicians but more understanding. Instead we got uppity finger pointers leading no one into a complete betterment. I'm not saying it's the politicians fault but if they won't government over others they need to be worthy of it and in my opinion the only way to do that is to lead others to govern themselves thereby truly increasing freedom and decreasing all the atrocities of society here within our own country.